Sharing threat intelligence is useful, but the strategy needs to be more, "going to the well" than "drinking from the hose." Think of the NSA's collection of information, which has been found to largely be ineffective at discovering attacks.
Communications, legal, and customer service departments were all more likely to open a phishing email. There is no easy solution or magic wand that can make phishing go away. We need to focus on better filtering, developing and executing an ENGAGING and THOROUGH security awareness program, and improve detection and response capabilities.
It's more effective to focus on getting a patch deployment strategy put in place, than trying patching systems as soon as a new patch is in place. Ten CVEs account for almost 97% of exploits observed in 2014. The ten:
- CVE-2002-0012 - SNMP
- CVE-2002-0013 - SNMP
- CVE-1999-0517 - SNMP
- CVE-2001-0540 - Memory leak
- CVE-2014-3566 - POODLE
- CVE-2012-0152 - RDP
- CVE-2001-0680 - Directory traversal
- CVE-2002-1054 - Directory traversal
- CVE-2002-1931 - XSS
- CVE-2002-1932 - Log deletion
According to this list, there is still a lot of vulnerabilities from the past that need to be patched. Getting a patching process in place is great for all the new stuff, but don't forget about all the old stuff that came out before the security team was in place.
".03% of smartphones per week were getting owned by "high-grade" malicious code."
Android is the worst operating system (everyone saw that one coming) and, "most of the malware is adnoyance-ware and similar resource-wasting infections." This might change in the future, but for now it's not a huge area of concern.
My favorite line came from this section, "Special snowflakes fall on every backyard," which is in relation to "new" malware getting around anti-virus as being described as "advanced" or "targeted." Not the case according to the report. Malware is being given unique hashes to avoid detection by anti-virus.
Each organization is unique, which is not earth shattering, but good to understand when looking at internal and external entities.
There is some supply and demand with data breaches: the higher the amount of records lost; the lower the cost of each record. Keep in mind records only tell half the story when it comes to the impact of a breach. There is fallout, not only within the company but outside it.
Incident classification patterns
96% of data breaches fall into nine basic pattersn:
- POS Intrusions - 28.5%
- Crimeware - 18.8%
- Cyber-Espionage - 18%
- Insider Misuse - 10.6%
- Web App Attacks - 9.4%
- Miscellaneous Errors - 8.1%
- Physical Theft/Loss - 3.3%
- Payment Card Skimmers - 3.1%
- Denial of Service - .1%
These are all from the first half of the report. The other half of the report went into discussing each time of data breach and what we can learn. I highly recommend reading the whole report. Not only is it an easy read, but it gives great insight into the current landscape of breaches